Invalid contract
If we disable creation of this type of numeric market (`outcomeType = MULTI_NUMERIC`) for more than a week, I will resolve to the # of days after today that we first flipped the flag/turned off creation.
@pietrokc I mean you can do all of that with multiple choice (or for some of what you describe, just binary tbh). this is just a quick way to set up your multiple choice market to cover ranges a numeric value
Ooo, would this also have been a valid use for percent buckets like this?
@Quroe sure! That'd give more leverage than just resolving to prob with a binary market and an expected value at the top. We do have a max of 12 buckets right now though bc fewer buckets is a better experience much of the time. I could see expanding that if you're inputting your own answers, though
@ian The market title in my original comment is actually a live market link. Will there be support for retroactively making markets like this numeric? Would there be appetite to explore the idea of retrofitting older markets to the new format?
@Quroe That wouldn't be too hard actually! We'd just need to generate the midpoints for each of your buckets (claude does this) and change your outcomeType to MULTI_NUMERIC, and I think that's it